This is an outdated version published on 2025-01-09. Read the most recent version.

Labor Law in Russia: Historical Contradictions in the Regulation of Labor Relationships

Authors

Keywords:

history of labor law, factory-and-plant legislation, problems of labor law in Russia, history and modernity of labor law, over-centralization of labor law

Abstract

The aim of the work is to study the main patterns of the development of labor law in Russia in their problematic key. A conclusion is made about the presence of a number of general trends in the development of the branch of law. Pre-revolutionary and Soviet legislators formed strategic concepts and individual judgments in the legal regulation of labor relationships. At the same time the genesis and development of this branch of law were characterized by a number of destructive foundations that are inherent to particular systems and historical periods. Such ‘genetic’ problems are: laws making the legal regulation of work susceptible to the influence of the political environment; periodic evasion by legislators of the objective economic principles; the conflict between standard legal regulation and unlawful practices in the world of work; excessive formalization of labor law; a degree of centralization in regulating labor relationships, which was not optimum. The above contradictions are largely objective and forced in nature. However, the fight against them is still necessary in the interests of increasing the efficiency of the regulation of the world of labor in the Russian society.

Author Biography

Nikolay V. Demidov, Tomsk State University

Associate Professor of the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law of Tomsk State University, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Law and Law Enforcement at Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radio Electronics

Published

2025-01-09

Versions

How to Cite

Демидов, Н. В. (2025). Labor Law in Russia: Historical Contradictions in the Regulation of Labor Relationships. EUROPEAN AND ASIAN LAW REVIEW, 7(4), 10–21. Retrieved from https://ealawreview.ru/index.php/ea/article/view/175